By Bert Scalzo on
Wednesday, November 29, 2006 8:10 AM
Last month I wrote about “Why Reverse Engineering is Always Worthwhile.” So the logical next issue to examine is forward engineering – its different approaches and its many comparative benefits. The best way to do this is via an analogical example J
I live in Dallas-Fort Worth. Let’s assume that I drove down to Austin at the start of the this year’s college football season to watch my #1 Ohio State Buckeyes play against...
|
By Mike Ault on
Monday, November 27, 2006 8:44 AM
Oracle’s Oracle10g requires more memory than was ever required before. If you utilize any of the new features such as automatic storage management (ASM) and automatic shared memory management (ASMM) then you really need to pay attention to what memory is doing in 10g.
|
By Mike Ault on
Wednesday, November 15, 2006 3:50 PM
I remember reading “Brave New World” when I was in high school, we needn’t mention the year. I was fascinated by the system described in the book that seemed so logical on the surface but needed so many props underneath to keep it going. It reminds me at times of some of the Oracle management that goes on these days.
What exactly do I mean? Many times Oracle management tools that look good on the surface are actually...
|
By Richard To on
Monday, November 13, 2006 12:28 PM
The Nested Loop join operation is the basic join operation which is supported by most RDBMS, since it requires less memory and less temporary space. Normally, it can provide faster data response time than other join operations. But, the path of a Nested Loop join will significantly affect the speed of the join operation. Let’s use a two table join as an example to understand how this works.
|
By Steven Feuerstein on
Thursday, November 09, 2006 11:55 AM
When an exception is raised, one of the most important pieces of information a programmer would love to get hold of is the line of code that caused the exception to be raised. Before Oracle 10g came long, the only way to get this information was to allow the exception to go unhandled and then view the error stack. The following chain of program calls shows you what I mean.
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE my_procedure_1...
|
By Mike Ault on
Wednesday, November 08, 2006 1:46 PM
I often see DBAs and developers who don’t know the first thing about tuning SQL. They ask “Why do I need to know that, can’t Oracle tune itself?” The truth of the matter is that Oracle is, for the most part, able to do a pretty decent job of tuning itself if it is given enough information and the queries or tuning tasks aren’t too complex. However, there are times when Johnny must tune.
What do I mean by “enough information”?...
|
By Steven Feuerstein on
Thursday, November 02, 2006 11:28 AM
All those big brain technoids always make such a big deal out of testing. Too many bugs in our software! Bugs cost money! Bugs make us look bad! Test your code before you give it to your users! Test your code before you write your code! Test your code before you learn how to write code! C'mon, I say, give us a break!
Here's the way I look at it: we could bust our buttons working extra special hard to get rid of lots...
|
By Mike Ault on
Wednesday, November 01, 2006 3:30 PM
With each new release of a database, be it Oracle or one of their competitors, we hear the cry that this release will make DBAs as we know them obsolete. We hear again and again how this automated feature set or that new GUI interface will automate the DBA job. So far, all of these claims of DBA obsolescence have been for naught, to mis-quote Samual Clements “The reports of the DBAs death are greatly exaggerated.”
When...
|
By Steven Feuerstein on
Monday, October 30, 2006 4:58 PM
Welcome to my Toad World blog! I will offer on this blog a wide variety of tips and incredibly deep and surprising insights on the Oracle PL/SQL language (the object of my obsessive personality for the last 10+ years). I look forward to your responses and critiques. That is: I hope you will engage with these ideas and feel perfectly comfortable with disagreeing with me, offering other, perhaps better, ideas, and in general...
|
By Richard To on
Monday, October 30, 2006 2:28 PM
For years, commercial database manufacturers have fought an endless battle to improve the performance of inserting, updating, deleting, and retrieving information stored in the database. Despite their continual efforts and hard work, we have not seen a significant improvement in the performance of most Relational Database Management Systems (RDBMS). Users still suffer from under-performing SQL statements and database experts...
|
By Bert Scalzo on
Monday, October 30, 2006 1:04 PM
In many shops that I visit, neither the DBA’s nor the database developers place much value on performing data modeling. Often there are seemingly sound reasons for this exclusion: the historically high price of data modeling tools, data models are not required as a project milestone or deliverable, and quite often the database was simply either inherited or supports a third party application – and thus is not open for modification....
|
By Mike Ault on
Wednesday, October 18, 2006 4:54 PM
When I started working with Oracle in 1990 there weren’t many SQL tuning tools available. At most you had the Oracle supplied tools which allowed you to capture an explain plan and minimal tracing. Most SQL tuning consisted of either encouraging the use to a particular index by making sure the column in the index was on the leading edge of the index or, defeating the use of the index through null concatenation to character...
|